I am leaving you the link on the American sign language so you can practice and use this tool. It also has different activities you can use in class.
http://www.lifeprint.com/
|
|
UNSATISFACTORY
0
points
|
SATISFACTORY
4
points
|
ABOVE
AVERAGE 6 pts
|
EXCELLENT
8
points
|
|
A. CONTENT:
Includes thesis statement and both quantity and
quality of supporting details
|
Thesis is
lacking or incorrect, and not supported with appropriate detail. Writing is
thin, including generalizations with few or no concrete examples or
illustrations.
|
Thesis is
apparent but general or commonplace. Support may be sketchy or occasionally
irrelevant. Generalizations are supported with examples, but content may be
thin.
|
Thesis is
explicit, appropriate, and well supported. Content is both adequate and
appropriate, providing examples and illustrations to support all
generalizations.
|
Thesis is
explicit and significant, assertive, objectively worded, and supported with
substantial and relevant information. The essay includes a wealth of relevant
details, examples, or imagery.
|
|
B. ORGANIZATION:
Includes paragraph development and arrangement of
body paragraphs, as well as coherence (introduction, body, conclusion)
|
The plan and
purpose of the essay are not apparent. It is not developed or is developed
with some irrelevancy or redundancy. Paragraphs are incoherent or
undeveloped. Transitions are lacking.
|
The plan of
development is apparent but not consistently followed. The writing lacks
clarity or is repetitious. The paragraphs are generally effective, but
transitions may be weak or mechanical.
|
The plan of
development is clear and consistently followed. The writing is concise and
clear, with a minimum of repetition. Paragraphs are generally well-developed
and effective, with appropriate transitions.
|
It is planned
logically and progresses in clearly ordered and necessary steps, and
developed with originality and attention to proportion and emphasis.
Paragraphs are logically and effectively developed with effective
transitions.
|
|
C. DICTION AND MECHANICS:
Includes conventions of grammar, usage, and
punctuation, as well as appropriate diction
|
Often, sentences
are not grammatically correct. Vocabulary is elementary, not college level.
Words are used incorrectly. Persistent usage, spelling, or punctuation errors
exist.
|
Sentences are
generally correct but may lack distinction, creativity, or style. Vocabulary
is generally used correctly. Occasional lapses in grammar, punctuation, or
spelling exist.
|
Sentences are
correctly constructed and demonstrate variety. The vocabulary is effective
and appropriate. Errors in grammar, punctuation, or spelling are rare.
|
The sentences
are skillfully constructed, effective, and varied. Words used are vivid,
accurate, and original. The writing is without flaws in grammar or mechanics.
A personal style is evident.
|
|
D. RESEARCH AND DOCUMENTATION:
Includes documentation and incorporation of
appropriate college-level sources
|
Sources are
lacking or inappropriate. Information from sources is not adequately
incorporated into the body of the essay. Documentation is missing,
inadequate, or incorrect.
|
Sources are
adequate, but may be too general. Information is occasionally weakly
incorporated or is unconnected to the content of the essay. Documentation is
generally correct, but may contain some minor errors.
|
Sources are
generally relevant, authoritative, and appropriate. Information is relevant
and is usually incorporated correctly. In-text citations and References or
Works Cited page are generally correct.
|
Sources used are
relevant, substantial, and authoritative, demonstrating creativity and
scholarly research. Information is introduced and incorporated smoothly and
appropriately. Documentation is clear and free of errors.
|
|
Concept
|
Exceptional (6)
|
Competent
(5-4)
|
Needs work
(3-2)
|
Incompetent
(1-0)
|
(30%)
|
The writing displays remarkable vocabulary mastery. Lexical
density is high-level. Words and/or expressions are varied, complex, dated, and
well collocated. Striking management/ use of affixes. Appropriate style and
register in word choice. No wordiness, redundancy and/or pomposity present.
|
The writing
displays good vocabulary usage. Lexical density is mid-level. Words and/or
expressions variegate but tend to be outdated or/and simplistic. Minor errors
in collocations. Style and register in word choice becomes unfitting at
times. Good management/ use of affixes. Wordiness, redundancy and/or
pomposity partially obfuscate the writing.
|
The writing
displays fair vocabulary usage. Lexical density is low-level. Words and/or
expressions are repeated, elementary and/or fall out of use. Major errors in
collocations. Style and register is mostly inappropriate in word choice. Fair
management/ use of affixes. Wordiness, redundancy and/or pomposity rather obfuscate
the writing.
|
The writing displays poor vocabulary usage. No
lexical-density. Words and/or expressions are basic, over repeated and there
is not even awareness of word fashion and collocations. Style and register is
inappropriate in the whole writing. Poor and/or no management / use of
affixes. Wordiness, redundancy and/or pomposity obfuscate the entire writing.
|
(20%)
|
The writing is flawless in tense, number and
agreement. It includes a sophisticated variety of tenses and structures.
|
The writing has occasional grammatical
mistakes (1 to 4) in tense, number or agreement. It includes a wide variety
of tenses and structures.
|
The writing has few grammatical mistakes (5
to 9) in tense, number or agreement. It includes a restricted variety of
tenses and structures.
|
The writing brims with grammatical mistakes
(more than 10) in tense, number and agreement. There is no variety of tenses
and structures.
|
(15%)
|
The writing is thoughtfully linked to the topic concerned. It begins
or/and ends with the topic sentence given. Exemplary or impacting quality of
ideas and rationale which readily draws the reader in. The writer is aware of
the tone of the writing.
|
The writing is
clearly linked to the topic concerned. It begins/ends with the topic sentence
given but subjected to some modifications. Good quality of ideas and
interesting rationale. The tone is uneven and possibly inappropriate in
spots.
|
The writing
tends to be digressive and unattached to the topic concerned. It begins/ends
with the topic sentence given but does not begin/end this way or properly.
Fair quality of ideas and vapid rationale. The tone is inconsistent in
general.
|
The writing
does not focus on the topic concerned and does not begin/end with the topic
sentence given either. Inchoate ideas and illogical rationale which do not
flow in meaning. The tone is inappropriate.
|
(15%)
|
Clear introduction, development and
conclusion. The writing successfully meets
the amount of words requested. Strong paragraphs ordered to develop
exposition.
|
Partly clear introduction, development
or/and conclusion. The writing meets the amount of words requested. Puny
paragraphs leading to sequence faltering.
|
Unclear introduction, development or/and
conclusion. The writing barely meets the amount of words requested. Weak
paragraphs which do not provide with details of the topic sentence. Flabby
sequencing.
|
One paragraph
or text divided but not by content. The writing does not meet the amount of
words requested.
|
|
5. Cohesion and Coherence
(10%)
|
Proper and wide use of transitions and
linking devices. The writing is fluent, laconic and rife with meaningful
sentences which create a thorough association
with previous statements with subsequent ones. Wide variety of sentence type
and length.
|
Proper but narrow use of transitions and
linking devices. The writing is logical, orderly but inconsistent for undeveloped
or lack of meaningful sentences. Restricted variety of sentence type and
length.
|
Some faltering in the use of transitions
and linking devices, which are constantly repeated rendering the sentences
disjointed and patchy. The writing lacks logics, order and/or consistency
Some fragments and run-on sentences throughout. No variety of sentence type
and length.
|
Transitions and linking devices are rarely
used. The writing is bitty and sentences are not properly anchored. It is
mechanical and lacks logics, order and consistency. Sentences are simplistic
and fail to convey complex/abstract ideas.
|
& Tidiness
(5%)
|
The writing displays correct punctuation
and case throughout. An ample variety of marks are used. The assignment is
neat and well formed.
|
The writing falters in punctuation, with
minor errors, though. It has some errors in capitalisation. A reduced variety of marks is used, The
assignment is not that neat and well typed.
|
The writing displays few punctuation and
case errors. There is no a variety of marks. The assignment is somewhat
untidy . (ink blots, crumbled etc.) and handwritten or typed in colours.
|
The writing has no punctuation patterns or
uses them ineffectively. There is no/little capitalisation. The assignment is
not duly presented (it has no cover page; it is stained or has ink blots,
etc. ; the piece of paper is crumbled, has jagged edges, etc. ; it is written
in colours or/and with a sloppy
handwriting, etc.)
|
(5%)
|
No spelling errors.
|
Few spelling errors. There is little
congruency with the variety of English chosen.
|
Some spelling errors. There is no
congruency with the variety of English
chosen.
|
Many spelling errors.
|
|
Total: 42 marks
|
|
|
||
1.
|
2.
|
3.
|